Objectivist Economic
Lessons from Honey Boo Boo
Toddlers & Tiaras
is the horrifyingly hypnotizing ‘reality show’ about children’s beauty
pageants. Its new spin-off, Here Comes Honey Boo Boo, is just downright
horrifying. It follows the exploits of a rural Georgia family as they interrupt
their slovenly lives and quaint pastimes (mud-diving, discount pedicures for
four-toed gay uncles) to help their 6-year-old Alana (aka Honey Boo Boo) pursue
the ever-elusive rhinestone-and-pipe-cleaner crown. Honey Boo Boo is particularly fond of baring her tummy,
caressing it, and making it produce a symphony of gross sounds.
Who watches this disgusting drivel (well, other than certain
bloggers who prefer to remain anonymous)?
Who believes there’s something to learn from this family?
Perhaps Paul Ryan and other devotees of the execrable writer
and simplistically juvenile philosopher, Ayn Rand.
Honey Boo Boo’s relatives (her 300-pound mother June, her
father Sugar Bear, her half-sisters Pumpkin, Chubbs, and Chickadee, and her pet
pig Glitzy) form a wonderful example of how Ayn Rand’s Objectivist worldview
(espoused early and often and publically and globally, until about five days
ago, by Paul Ryan) can be realized in 21st-century America.
They show that poor people can take care of themselves
perfectly well, thank you very much.
No social safety nets needed.
(Indeed, no social safety net could hold them.) The Boo Boos (they have
a variety of last names, as their legally recognized connections are
complicated, so it’s easier to refer to them as a conglomerate) are just the
sort of self-reliant bootstrappers that Paul Ryan (and presumably, now the
Romney-Ryan ticket, not to mention the early Ayn Randian, Justice Clarence
Thomas) would hold up as models for emulation, following Rand’s belief in the
triumph of the unfettered sovereign individual, thanks to free-market
capitalism’s will-to-power. As
Honey Boo Boo herself proclaims, she’ll “hollah for the dollah.”
Who needs food stamps when, with enough initiative, you like
the Boo Boos can scoop up road kill and transform it into a winter’s worth of
hearty, if hygienically compromised, provisions? To supply side dishes for
squished-venison sausage and decapitated-skunk stew, Honey Boo Boo’s family
amasses coupons in quantities enough to put most local landfills out of
business. According to Mama June,
they are ‘extreme couponers’ who can parley a shopping bag full of paper scraps
into a pick-up truck full of useful items like stale Pringles and Little Debbie
Snack Cakes.
If they’re still in need of basic comestibles, they attend
“Food Auctions,” where you can bid on lots of sell-date-expired processed food
(which is saying a ton, considering that the chemical composition of much
processed food resembles the half-life of cockroaches). In a recent episode, the Boo Boos
purchased approximately five cartons of plastic-enclosed once-upon-a-time
baked goods for only two dollars. (Which
neatly parallels the Ryan [Ryan-Romney?] plan for rescuing Medicaid and/or
Medicare: save some money, then
spend the savings on things that are absolutely worthless, like more money
shoveled into the already bloated Health Care Industry. If you’re an individual unhealthy
person, do what the Boo-Boos do: deny or ignore that there’s any thing
wrong. That way you won’t waste
any money at all on health care.
As Mama June stated, it’s fine with her if her daughters weigh 1,000
pounds each – and if other people don’t approve of it, they can just stuff it.)
Extreme Couponing, as disclosed in a recent episode of Here Comes Honey Boo Boo, demonstrates
another bedrock principle of Rand and Ryan’s Objectivist philosophy. Selfishness is all. If it takes a supermarket clerk five
hours to process your mountains of ten-cent-off coupons so you can buy enough
cheap toilet paper to stock every survivalist bunker from Georgia to Wyoming,
so be it. The people behind you in
line SHOULD suffer, seeing as how they were fruity-pants enough to come to the
store bearing only a wallet’s worth of coupons. And the unlucky checker? If he’d had enough gumption, he’d have owned the darned
grocery and a whole lot more. Sort
of like John Gault (Atlas Shrugged
hero). And if he didn’t like how
his grocery stores were operating, he’d blow them up. Sort of like Howard Roark (The Fountainhead hero).
No compromise!
Nor do we need anything like government family planning
initiatives. (Oh . . . whoopsie .
. . Ayn Rand, in a sort of intellectual eugenic dithyramb, supported birth
control and abortion. But Paul Ryan doesn’t,
under any circumstances . . . one of the reasons Ryan has conveniently and VERY
recently started to moonwalk back from his ideological muse.) So for Ryan, in any event, the spewing
out of unplanned-for children (Mama June had Chickadee when June was fifteen .
. . Chickadee [mid-teens, no baby father in sight] is pregnant) must be a good
thing. More good-governing lessons
(or ‘less’ ins) from the Boo Boos.
Of course, the most awesome Objectivist trait of Honey Boo
Boo and her family is the fact that they have their own TV reality show. And without the equal-time Communist
nonsense that the Obama Reich has been trying to impose! Guess there’s no Reality TV program
about a family in which members have jobs, pay taxes, send their kids to
college, refrain from farting in public, and don’t get pregnant in middle
school! I mean, be serious – who’d
watch unless Uncle Joe Stalin implanted tiny receivers in their brains before
shipping them off to the Gulag to write subversive movie scripts?
Which brings up another swell Ayn Rand Objectivist Trait: being a craven ratfink, which is an
excellent ability if it saves your own Objectivistly worthy-of-being-saved
skin. Rand, who made much of her
living as a Hollywood screenwriter, was in the vanguard of those who tripped
over themselves to testify in the McCarthy-era “investigations” of “Communist
influence” in Tinseltown, passing on rumors and making things up in order to
advance their own careers and destroy the careers of others. Rand’s heroes would have done no less. Nor would many other parents featured
in Toddlers and Tiaras and its
Reality TV clones.
To be fair, the Boo Boos seem less prone to bad-mouth other contestants
than do many televised child beauty pageant parents. Maybe the Boo Boos’ noisome participation in the ‘Morality
of Capitalism’ (Paul Ryan’s words describing the timeless ideological appeal of
Ayn Rand) doesn’t leave them time to calumniate lesser mortals (or ‘parasites,’
in Ayn Rand’s words describing the poor, the disabled, and the unlucky . . .
and maybe those who don’t ‘pull out’ for the Ultimate Grand Supreme Crown). Or maybe the sunny and funny disposition,
and apparently bright mind, of Honey Boo Boo herself (I’m not kidding here –
she seems like a rather sweet and intelligent child, despite her coarse nurturing
and/or the way that nurturing is displayed on television) keep her family from
coming across as complete moral monsters.
Speaking of morality:
Not too long ago, many people (perhaps including the
anonymous blogger referred to above) made fun of George W. Bush for stating, in
response to a Presidential Debate question, that Jesus Christ was his “favorite
philosopher.” But if we compare
the choices now before us through the prism of Honey Boo Boo (as she and her
folks are portrayed) and of the Randian Objectivism that seems to have been
operating much more forcefully in our culture than most of us thought . . .
The Synoptic Gospels don’t agree on everything, but they do
suggest that Jesus was committed profoundly to some variety of social justice
and compassion. Despite extra-canonical documents like the Gospels of Thomas,
Judas, and Mary (which put forth a more Gnostic, kingdom-within-you view of Jesus’
teachings), Christianity in its many current forms basically agrees on the
divinely mandated importance of helping the less fortunate. So does Judaism (he who saves one
person saves the world). So does
Islam, in which practiced charity is one of the five ways one becomes a Muslim. So do Boddhisatvas, who remain in the
round of rebirth in order to help all beings achieve ultimate peace.
So, seriously, do many atheists, who agree on the ultimate moral
importance of social justice and compassion. Without believing in a divine
mandate, most atheists I know think that since all we have is what we are/experience/do
in this world, we’d better act as thoughtfully and as humanely as we possibly
can or else our heart-stoppingly finite existence means absolutely nothing.
But Ayn Rand was not that sort of atheist. At least in her public life (which is the
sum total of what almost anyone, including Paul Ryan, knows of her), she was
all-for-one, and that-one-is me, all the time. Which is another reason Ryan is disavowing his life-long
admiration of her right now, as atheism of any ilk does not play well with the
electorate. At least the Boo-Boos
take care of each other, even if it’s keeping bellies full with stale loaves
and beached fishes.
Atlas shrugged.
Jesus
wept.
Honey Boo Boo rubbed her tummy.
No comments:
Post a Comment